| Digital Art / Drawings / Animals | ©2009-2012 ~dustdevil |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness |





--
"If far from the Force you find yourself, trust you can that it is not the Force which moved."
My Portfolio [link]
Now open for commissions. See here for details [link]
--
My friend, can you really live on that side?
In a world that abhors YOU and I?
--
Killer. Mother. Whatever.
--
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." -- Douglas Adams (Last Chance to See)
I was thinking Hypuronector might have been aquatic (or semi-aquatic), because it seems to be much less adapted for arboreal life than its ofter relatives.
--
"Why do you necessarily have to be wrong just because a few million people think you are?"
Aquatic tails, like those of crocodiles and sea-reptiles are also wide and muscular at the base, and generally fairly flexible.
Many reptiles have flat or deep tails that are comparatively weak and stiff, and are simply used for camouflage. This was the case with Hypruronector, it's tail-bones are thin and delicate, and relatively inflexible. This would make it a very poor swimming organ.
Also, it's lesser adaptations to climbing may simply indicate a sedentary lifestyle. Sloths have comparatively puny muscles today, and no gripping digits, but spend almost their whole life in the trees. Their ancestors however were massively muscled and lived on the ground somewhat like dinosaurs. Similarly, a lizard with energetic climning skills, like a monitor, is far more muscular than a sedentary gecko.
--
Me>
My only reference for Hypuronector has been a simple skeletal drawing that really doesn't tell much about the wideness or flexibility of the tail (or at least I don't have the skills to interpret that). If tail wasn't flexible, it probably isn't a swimming device.
Hypuronector also seems to have much less robust limbs than the other simiosaurs, but it might, of course, be because of the more sloth-like habits. Though sloths seem to use their long claws to hang from the trees and thus don't need gripping digits, and your Hypuronector doesn't have anything like that. Am I right to assume that the digits are actually unknown?
--
"Why do you necessarily have to be wrong just because a few million people think you are?"
--
Me>