Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Pterodactylus kochi by dustdevil Pterodactylus kochi by dustdevil
Add a Comment:
 
:iconemperordinobot:
EmperorDinobot Featured By Owner Nov 5, 2007
That is very nice.
Reply
:iconchronoscat:
ChronosCat Featured By Owner Mar 15, 2006  Hobbyist General Artist
If sea-birds are colored that way now, it makes sense a creature filling a similar niche way back then would be colored similarly. Neat.
Reply
:iconjohnfaa:
JohnFaa Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2009  Student Writer
Although Pterodactylus itself was more of a shorebird analogue than a seagull/albatross/gannet/whatever one. I guess a brownish colouration would be more realistic?
Reply
:iconsamantha-marrs:
Samantha-Marrs Featured By Owner Feb 28, 2006
very realistic drawing, i swear i thought it was a photo when i clicked it!
Reply
:iconjconway:
jconway Featured By Owner Feb 27, 2006
Looks a bit too smudgy for my liking - it could do with being sharpened up to the detail of the photo.
Reply
:icondustdevil:
dustdevil Featured By Owner Feb 27, 2006  Professional General Artist
Yes, I agree. But no more work on it. I hate pterosaurs so much.
Reply
:iconjconway:
jconway Featured By Owner Feb 28, 2006
Ha!
Reply
:iconthomcomstock:
thomcomstock Featured By Owner Feb 27, 2006  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Very nice work. I am going to have to look at your gallery now. :)
Reply
:icondragonrain:
Dragonrain Featured By Owner Feb 24, 2006
Woah nice. I thought it was a photo at first! Good job. xD
Reply
:iconzakafreakarama:
zakafreakarama Featured By Owner Feb 24, 2006
In fact, pterosaurs aren't dinosaurs at all, though they all died at the same time. There were no flying dinosaurs (except, of course, birds). :reading:
Reply
:iconzakafreakarama:
zakafreakarama Featured By Owner Feb 24, 2006
Beautiful. :cries:
Reply
:iconcelestial-seraphiman:
Celestial-SeraphiMan Featured By Owner Feb 24, 2006   Writer
Impressive.
Reply
:icondustdevil:
dustdevil Featured By Owner Feb 24, 2006  Professional General Artist
Thanks all. This one will be published but cutted on white.
I choose to post it here with a photographic background. I didn't take the time to work better the integration, it's not convincing like it is.
Reply
:iconaxelmedellin:
AxelMedellin Featured By Owner Feb 23, 2006  Professional Digital Artist
cool!
Reply
:iconfurryphotos:
furryphotos Featured By Owner Feb 23, 2006  Professional Photographer
Nicely drawn :)
Reply
:iconelmohead:
elmohead Featured By Owner Feb 23, 2006
That's not a photo lol. Anyway, Very accurate lighting makes it look like a photo in the thumbnail view. well done!
Reply
:iconlibis:
Libis Featured By Owner Feb 23, 2006  Hobbyist General Artist
what about the background?
Reply
:iconchuux:
chuux Featured By Owner Feb 23, 2006
nice photo! i thought they were all dead!
Reply
:iconxanderlover:
xanderlover Featured By Owner Feb 23, 2006
" nice photo! i thought they were all dead!"

XDDD

Their dinosaurs. Of course their all dead

Lovely realistic picure by the way ;D
Reply
:iconthomcomstock:
thomcomstock Featured By Owner Feb 27, 2006  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Actually, according to modern cladistic analysis they do not belong to the dinosaur clade, but belong to the pterosaur monophyletic taxon of the archosaur family.
Reply
:iconjconway:
jconway Featured By Owner Feb 27, 2006
And dinosaurs are of course not dead, so wrong on all counts!
Reply
:iconthomcomstock:
thomcomstock Featured By Owner Feb 27, 2006  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Ah, that too. :)
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
February 23, 2006
Image Size
72.7 KB
Resolution
845×504
Thumb

Stats

Views
2,797
Favourites
71 (who?)
Comments
22
Downloads
248
×